If the device isn't present, the driver isn't loaded. When windows boots, the PnP manager scans the bus and for each device, loads the driver. A hardware driver won't get loaded if the hardware isn't present. As far as uninstalling hardware drivers, I don't have any that are running as services or with tray apps other than nvidia control panel (which I'll still have). If not and I have to reinstall windows to get it to boot, that's the nightmare I dread. My plan is to clone the drive with reflect and hope it boots. You should be mostly ready to go then, minus probably a little bit of tweaking Then arrange the screens in windows as appropriate. Then put the cloned drive into the new hardwareĪnd once windows is loaded, go on and install all the appropriate drivers from the hardware vendors. Reg delete "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\GraphicsDrivers\ScaleFactors" /F Reg delete "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\GraphicsDrivers\Connectivity" /F Reg delete "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\GraphicsDrivers\Configuration" /F Ignore requests to reboot until you are done, then do not reboot, just shut down.Īnd here is a BAT file to purge the existing monitor entries so they dont come back to haunt you Now, go and uninstall as much of the present hardware drivers as you can I doubt it.Ĭlone the drive and then boot the drive in the existing PC Hopefully I can clone my existing windows 10 install and it magically boots in the new PC. Thankfully there are not that many tables causing stutter on my rig, but it's annoying enough when this happens with some that I really like to play, LOL. Like you, I cannot significantly upgrade the CPU without getting a new MoBo, CPU, memory and basically rebuild the whole system. at least if they'd be used more intensively, that could perhaps help. I don't see any of the cores maxed out either. Single-core performance of FX processors is a lot worse compared to a better Intel CPU. I'm in the same boat (although at a lot lower level) because my AMD FX 8320E processor definitely hinders / bottlenecks my GTX 1060 GPU, even while playing a few demanding tables at 1080p / 60Hz only. I suppose if they could use multiple cores more efficiently, that should help but it doesn't look like this'll happen anytime soon, if ever. VPX & PinMAME are not multi-threaded so a CPU with very good single core performance is really important. This indeed seems to be the reason for such a trouble. It'd be a bummer because moving CPU requires new motherboard and possibly starting over with a fresh install Perhaps my bottleneck is a CPU with faster single core speed? Perhaps the VP and pinmame only use a couple cores of the CPU at 100% and aren't very threaded so I suppose that's why I could be seeing 66% CPU with some slower frame rates. Looks like the 11400 has about a 35% increase in single core performance over my 4690.Įdited by BigBoss, 25 April 2022 - 01:08 PM. Perhaps I'll try to get that running and see what type of difference that makes. I have a spare I5 11400F CPU and board laying around here. Ideally, I'd like to run all the PUP stuff around 240 FPS+. I would consider grabbing a 3080 TI but I wonder if that'd even make any difference. Oddly, batman 66 with pup running is still > 160fps with CPU again around 66%. For example, turning on the SWDE pup pack brought the table FPS from 230fps down to 80 fps and wasn't worth it. I think the GPU got more important with the DX9 port and even more so with VPX.Īlso, some pup packs can really slow things down and brings the CPU usage way up. In the older days, the CPU was more important than the GPU for VP8. The board is an H81 so PCIe is only 2.0, but 8gb VRAM should be enough to not matter too much here. I'm running an RTX 2060 Super, Intel i5-4690, 16gb RAM. FPS is actually slightly lower if I lower this to 1920x1080 resolution (which seemed odd, but 1440p is the resolution I want to run anyway). Regardless of if the table is running 600fps or 120fps, the CPU is always around 66% in use and the GPU is also around 60-70% in use. In analyzing this, I've brought up performance counters to see where the bottlenecks are in my system and it's a bit confusing. Some run around 110-120fps and others can dip as low as 80 fps. I'll never go back to 60hz.Īnway, to really benefit from this, I want to keep most frame rates around 200+ FPS, and most tables manage this. In doing so, I moved to a 165hz monitor and found just how smooth this runs things. I'm updating my cabinet, software and hardware.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |